Friday, November 10, 2023

When only seeing is believing

One thing I've observed about Peter, is that he doesn't appear to acknowledge things that are happening, unless he can see them too. 

I remember a friend telling me years ago how her then boyfriend had been diagnosed with some form of neurodivergence as a child and that his mother used to put a plaster on her head to show that she had a headache. Without the plaster, the headache just didn't exist to him.

Professionals say that people with autism are highly visual and I wonder if our non-committal men struggle to see anything which doesn't take place right infront of their eyes. It's important to acknowledge of course that not all men with autism behave the way that our men do. I believe that a combination self-consuming, regulation-seeking traits of autism, a lack of emotional nurturing growing up and perhaps a genetic predisposition to narcissistic tendencies has created the man I know to be Peter. A bit of ego and male privilege thrown in and you have a concoction made for relationship misery. 

I know that some men will openly complain to their wives that they should be doing more during the day time when they're working and their women are child-rearing. I never really had that from Peter, instead I got flippant remarks when I complained to him that I was finding the physical, mental and emotional load of family draining. I was never allowed to complain because Peter had inner beliefs about my role in the family unit and it was clear from the comments, sulking and silent treatment I was given, that he didn't think that I was pulling my weight. 

He commented that he did "all the cleaning" because I asked him to vacuum once a week. The cleaning I did, which took place when he was out working, just never happened in his mind. Before he moved out, he would make breakfast for the children each morning and ensure they were dressed for the day. I knew at the time that he was resentful- a lack of eye contact, no hug or kiss in the morning, arguing with the children, crying from them and a sullen look on his face will tell you that, but he didn't say anything. Until one day he complained that he did "everything" in the mornings. I found myself listing all of the other things I did: their hair, clearing up after breakfast, getting bags ready, coats and shoes on, the mile long walk to school with them in all weathers. But because he had already left the house for work by this time and never saw any of it, he genuinely felt that he was "doing everything." He resented my morning showers, the time I spent drying my hair, getting dressed and applying make-up. Around 45 minutes in total. 

Then there was the cooking.
He cooked once or twice a week, all other meals were prepared by me and often ready by the time he got home. This wasn't through any request of his, he just happened to walk in at the time I liked to eat our evening meal. Peter was convinced that he did 50% of the cooking. I would even show him the meal planner and point out which meals I had made and which he had (also feeling a little immature for doing so but seeking out some form of acknowledgement and appreciation from him) but it made little difference. As always, Peter was stuck within the confines of his convictions.

Illnesses were always contentious issues as they got in the way of his plans. I was accused of planning intentionally to be ill when Peter had made other plans outside of family life. The anxiety of becoming ill when Peter had plans started making me ill. Little did I realise that I was run down by an undiagnosed autoimmune condition at the time and coupled with breastfeeding and sleep deprivation, I was often ill and needed support at weekends, instead our young, clingy children were lumbered upon me when I needed a break. He treated me like some glorified live-in babysitter. 

Sometimes, when I was probably feeling very low and unworthy, I think I believed Peter's perception of me as lazy. He never said it, but made me feel that way because he never acknowledged anything I did or thanked me for it and any expectations I had of him seemed to induce sulking. I was sleep deprived, nutrient deprived, love deprived and I needed more rest than I was getting, but I always felt guilty for it. All of these deprivations were invisible in Peter's world so I am sure he just thought I was taking advantage of him. Perhaps he knew his thoughts were cruel deep down which is why he never voiced them, but he certainly showed them anyway, loud and clear. 

Of course every couple has arguments about lack of support, needing more rest and it can become a point scoring exercise at times even for the happiest of couples. But our men are different, they simmer in entitlement and resentment and don't see what we're contributing to family life every day and they certainly don't want to discuss it. The emotional strain, the mental exhaustion and the practicalities which they just don't see because they're not interested enough to know. As cassandras, we are invisible to them. The work we do doesn't exist in their minds. 

Feminists are working hard to change the exploitative attitudes that some men have of women, mothers, carers. However, seeing women in their truth is of no benefit to our men at all and do they ever change their perceptions if it doesn't benefit them to do so? The only motivation for really acknowledging and appreciating what we bring to our families would be for a healthy marriage or relationship; is this really high on their priority list? I doubt it. So they continue choosing to be blind to us because ultimately, it is easier for them to not see.

Wednesday, November 1, 2023

When words always fail

During a session with my therapist this week, she explained to me that Peter appears to be stuck in his own convictions. She said that this is the reason that my words always seem to fail with him and that they will likely always fail. 

Any ideas, issues or opinions which challenge Peter's stringent beliefs will be cast aside, mocked, ridiculed or completely ignored. This presents like arrogance. Perhaps it is arrogance, ignorance or possibly both. Maybe simply, a fear of being wrong. 

I will always be stuck where conversations with Peter are concerned because he is in my life forever. We have had disagreements over the welfare of the children this week and he would not listen to, empathise or take my concerns seriously. I can never walk away properly because we have children together and it feels I have a lifetime ahead of me of being unheard and ignored for the sake of blind, pig ignorance. 

I strongly believe that love is an action, a choice to commit, to listen, to empathise even if you can't understand or feel something yourself. Love is a decision to always be there and to always be on your side. Despite the mind blindness of men like Peter, I can't help thinking that a commitment of love could have been made if they had wanted to make it. These men were betraying us from the moment they made a choice to shut down on us. Once married, or where there are children involved and you are as good as married, a decision has been made to stand together as a team and to work through the inevitable challenges of life together. Turning on the other spouse as opposed to supporting them is not a marriage or a partnership. The moment a decision is made not to support the other one, we're as good as divorced. And if they emotionally divorce us so easily, then why do they hold on to us? 

I think we are commodities, possessions and little more to these men eventually. Innate mysoginy runs deep. This week, Peter sent me a link to a website about "high conflict personality disorder" to view in light of myself. I could see some elements of myself within the description so I asked my therapist what she thought having seen her for the last five years. She told me that this is the sort of thing that mysoginistic men send to women who dare to speak up about injustices or concerns. We are labelled "high conflict."

Until Peter met me, he was mostly left alone to do as he pleased. He has had very little expectation placed upon him; he has been sheltered from responsibility. And then I arrived with all of my demands for him to contribute fairly and equally to the mental, practical and emotional load of family life and I am "high conflict." He sees me challenge the childrens' school if they put them in a class separate to their friends and I am "high conflict." Or when I ask the neighbours to turn down their music on a weekday evening when it is keeping the children awake I am "high conflict." When I dare to raise a discrepancy at work, there I am being "high conflict" again, all whilst Peter sits back and allows life to wash over him as he floats along idly toying with his special interests. When men do challenge injustice are they portrayed as "high conflict" or dramatic? No, because we live in a world where males are privileged. Take a man like ours who don't challenge the status quo because it suits them and us women are always at a heavy disadvantage.

Words will always be lost where there are challenges, emotions or problems which drive them because these men did not marry us to be partners and equals, they married us to soak up all of life's challenges for them so that they can then turn around and blame us for attracting all the drama. These men are lazy and they strategise it. We are supposed to support their laziness and unwillingness to engage assertively with day to day life. It's not that they aren't capable of hearing us, they just choose not to, because our words don't support their selfish ends. 

Anyone who is living this type of existance with a man and is considering divorce ought to know that their husband already divorced them a long time ago. 

My therapist is correct. My words will always fail on Peter, because I symbolise little more than drama, hard work, challenges and problems. He is deflecting before I even open my mouth. In so many ways and areas of my life, words are my power and my passion and if they strip the power of our words away from us, are we left with any power at all? 

The Reasons your Marriage/Relationship failed.

Luckily for me, I  can now label Peter as my ex, although I still have a lot to do with him because of the children.  Since separating, when...