He'd chosen me and yet appeared to have more emotional loyalty to them. He was emotionally enmeshed with them. When his mother hurt me with her criticisms of my parenting of a newborn that I dedicated my everything to, I was always being "too sensitive" and "intolerant." He could admit that she was interferring, that she was overbearing but excused her as "meaning well." He was absolutely more comfortable with my discomfort than he was with theirs.
When we were dating, he once left my bed to go to his 27 year old sister in the middle of the night because she was upset about splitting from a boyfriend a few weeks beforehand. He had been called to her by his mother who was consoling her at 3am. It was an open display of where his loyalties were expected to lie. It was a very clear message sent to me early on. I was not invited either. It was family matters. A few years later, I found Peter consoling his sister at her 30th birthday party after his mother upset her and they had both disappeared. I found them upstairs, where my presence was clearly unwanted and I was told to return to the party and that they would be down again soon. The details of the upset were never divulged to me. Family matters never were.
Unknowingly, I blamed myself for far too long.
I just wasn't cutting it.
I was a troublemaker.
I really was too sensitive.
I'm pushing him away.
I'm unlovable.
I create drama.
I've disappointed him.
Thank goodness I disappointed him. This is the main reason he was more loyal to his family of origin. I'd disappointed him for calling out bad behaviour, for being intolerant and noncompliant, for saying no, for not being more accommodating.
Many of our men have never been challenged or criticised by their parents and so they gravitate back to them when life with us becomes tough. We are not their caregivers, we don't provide them with financial gifts or endeavour to meet their every little whim, where often their parents have done so. They deem their parents safer because they excuse him, demand nothing of him and in many ways, still povide for him.
He was an older brother to a sister who was several years younger than him.
He was always admired, always put on a pedestal, perhaps due to her own undiagnosed neurodiversity also. Family bonds don't change, fade or end in enmeshed families, they are all one and cult-like. Peter has always been made to feel very important by his family of origin or was left to his own devices without any expectations of him and so, when I came along with my expectations of him, he felt challenged and victimised. Naturally, he gravitated towards them more so.
When I expressed my unhappiness to his mother with a young baby in my arms and a toddler at my side, she excused him like he excused her. "He needs his down time." I needed mine too, but my needs were not her priority or anyone's priority, certainly not his. They collaborated with each other albeit rather silently at times. They were all of one mindset, all one entity like nothing I'd seen before. A cult.
When I was encouraged by his sister to confide in her about our failing relationship, she listened only to know things. Behind my back, she was collaborating with him and creating a divide between us, pulling her brother back to her. I imagine her subconscious whispering "I have zero expectations of you, unlike her, she's unreasonable... I'll massage your ego like she never will..."
Because he belonged to her.
He belonged to them all. He wanted to belong to them. You can't marry when you're already married. My criticism of his negative behaviour became her ammunition in the end and he excused her anonymous online trolling of my blogs and posts and even her accusations that anonymous posts in a group were mine (they weren't). He even praised her for it, let alone defended her. I'd dared to reach out in a private group asking for help with the dysfunction which she'd been accustomed to and she found it, screenshot everything, shared it with the cult and continued being pleasant with me on the surface. Then she began attacking my personal blog anonymously. He refused to believe it was her, but was happy to believe her untruths about me. I'd spent years getting him to see that his mother's behaviour wasn't ok and we'd made progress, but getting him to see that his innocent little sister's wasn't ok came at the biggest price.
He feels important and powerful around them and victimised when he's expected to contribute to family life or be in a loving, functional, intimate relationship when he was with me. He'd never really been expected to be a grown-up. He had particularly never been expected to make sacrifices. He'd never had to make any sacrifices at all before. It was a foreign feeling to him.
" His life has changed enough" his mother once told me. Despite him remaining in his hometown, maintaining the same job for almost 20 years, the same friends... Whilst I'd moved towns, carried two babies and had huge body changes, developed an autoimmune disorder, lost friends, made new friends, moved away from my mother, lost my job, gained another and reduced my income significantly by working part-time and impacted my pension contributions.
His life had changed because he suddenly had responsibilities and expectations of him which had never been placed on him before. Thats what she really meant. In his mother's eyes was a wounded victim and he often behaved that way. They gave me the feeling that they thought I'd victimised him, that I was spoiling all his fun. I guess Peter was eventually saved from me by his family of origin who he has been living with since our separation almost two years ago.
It's odd that I always thought that the family he'd created with me, the loyalty to me which was building slowly, would prevail in the end. But it never did. Our men will always gravitate to the place and people where there is less challenge, where truths are unspoken and where there is comfort, familiarity and ease.
I'm grateful for disappointing him these days because it means that I was loyal to myself. Thank goodness I wasn't loyal to him. It took me a long time to realise also that he disappointed me too and to value this fact.
Peter asked me recently, after he'd had a couple of glasses of wine, "have I disappointed you?" He has never once asked me a question like this before. Peter does not do vulnerability.
"Yes, most definitely." I responded without elaboration.
"I guess I have disappointed you also" was my response.
"Yes" he replied uncomfortably, without elaboration.
But I sat comfortably with this, knowing exactly what this disappointment meant for him, knowing that disappointing him was the only way I was ever going to emotionally survive. Disappointing him means that I am free. It means that I've said "no more."
Of course, it is his family of origin who have disappointed him really. But he isn't capable of pinning that responsibility on them and I doubt ever will be. Them disabling him with their interferring and lack of expectation of him (which ultimately set me in a negative light) has given him the idea that they are kinder and good to him.
He really is a victim the more I think about it. A victim of their control, of their enmeshment and manipulation. A prisoner of their beliefs, their mentality, their habits, their values, their family "loyalty", their excuses. It has cost him hugely. His disappointment will forever be directed to me because my morals, beliefs and values are unfamiliar and impact him. I think of all the sacrifices and life changes I made to be with him, the requests for love and affection, the desire for a fulfilling family life-- which ultimately is what has disappointed him. I realise that his disappointment in me is rooted in him feeling pulled away from his family of origin, away from his old life and away from all that is familiar. I offered so much. And it is that which disappoints him.
And so he gravitates back to his family of origin, relieved.
